<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: New Feature: Detecting Non-Human Hits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cli.gs/news/new-feature-detecting-non-human-hits/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cli.gs/news/new-feature-detecting-non-human-hits</link>
	<description>The official blog of the short URL service at http://cli.gs/</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Von: Birgit Pauli-Haack</title>
		<link>http://blog.cli.gs/news/new-feature-detecting-non-human-hits#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator>Birgit Pauli-Haack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cli.gs/?p=230#comment-2474</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for this update. I find it fascinating and very important to be able to distinguish between bot traffic and human traffic. Depending on the goals of a link posting, it will take away the speculation and makes for better measuring. 

I would be interested to see a list of bots that are harvesting social media sites, where the cli.gs url most likely has been posted. 

Which site actually has more bot traffic then others, finding I publish a link on twitter and on facebook with different cli.gs ids, what produces more hits with bots? 

Bots are completely independent from your own set of followers or friends...and might be able to further the reach of a social media engagement beyond the known set of readers, listeners and participants. 

I am rambling, forgive me, I just try to wrap my head around all the metric opportunities and the purpose of it in reaching my ultimate goal, measuring quality, as much as I will be able to measure quantity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for this update. I find it fascinating and very important to be able to distinguish between bot traffic and human traffic. Depending on the goals of a link posting, it will take away the speculation and makes for better measuring. </p>
<p>I would be interested to see a list of bots that are harvesting social media sites, where the cli.gs url most likely has been posted. </p>
<p>Which site actually has more bot traffic then others, finding I publish a link on twitter and on facebook with different cli.gs ids, what produces more hits with bots? </p>
<p>Bots are completely independent from your own set of followers or friends&#8230;and might be able to further the reach of a social media engagement beyond the known set of readers, listeners and participants. </p>
<p>I am rambling, forgive me, I just try to wrap my head around all the metric opportunities and the purpose of it in reaching my ultimate goal, measuring quality, as much as I will be able to measure quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Eric Herberholz</title>
		<link>http://blog.cli.gs/news/new-feature-detecting-non-human-hits#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Herberholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cli.gs/?p=230#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feature and for the tweet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feature and for the tweet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

